An ongoing study conducted by researchers at the University of Cincinnati (UC) has found that water quality has not been impacted by natural gas drilling, or fracking. While the study itself has not yet been released, at a February 4th Carroll County Concerned Citizens meeting, the study’s head researcher, University of Cincinnati Assistant Professor Amy Townsend-Small, explained the results this way,
“The good news is that our study did not document that fracking was directly linked to water contamination.”
The study is the first of its kind in Ohio, and was originally inspired by the now discredited 2011 peer-reviewed study from Duke University to answer the question, “Tapping a Valuable Resource or Invading the Environment? Research Examines the Start of Fracking in Ohio?” To do so, the researchers set out to collect baseline samples over the course of three years. These samples were taken four-times per year from five Ohio shale counties. They focused on the most active area in the Utica, Carroll County, sampling from 23 water wells from 2012 to 2015, with a total of 191 samples.
The samples were taken from voluntary participants, many of whom are connected with anti-fracking groups such as the Carroll County Concerned Citizens. Although the University of Cincinnati claimed it did not receive funding from groups opposed to fracking, Dr. Townsend recently was reported as stating,
“I’m really sad to say this but some of our funders, the groups that had given us funding in the past, were a little disappointed in our results. They feel that fracking is scary and so they were hoping our data could point to a reason to ban it.” (emphasis added)
It is “really sad” that these groups found this news to be disappointing because it shows that they are not fighting to defend and promote health and safety issues but are more driven by a political campaign to find “a reason to ban” oil and gas development altogether.
After the 2011 Duke University study failed to draw connection to ground water contamination and hydraulic fracturing, the UC Department of Geology was awarded a $400,000, 3-year grant from the National Science Foundation (EAR-1229114) for an isotope ratio mass spectrometer, which is a scientific instrument that measures the composition of methane and can determine its root source. In other words, it allows us to tell where the methane is coming from and whether the methane is related to natural gas drilling or not. So, not only did the multi-year study tell us that groundwater contamination was not linked to hydraulic fracturing, it also identified no connection whatsoever to any natural gas source.
As is evident by the legitimate water contamination findings in Flint, Michigan, and most recently in Sebring, Ohio – and in the conclusions found in this three-year study – it’s clear that efforts to tackle water pollution should be directed at ageing infrastructure issues and pre-existing water quality issues from naturally occurring methane, rather than from fracking, which is clearly not causing the contamination.
If these Ohio environmentalists were truly concerned about the environment and the importance of water quality issues, they would focus their funding, campaigns, politics, public relations efforts on these real concerns, as opposed to trying to find “a reason to ban” fracking.