INFOGRAPHIC: Obama Administration Officials Explain Safety, Benefits of Shale

White House Shale Fracking

It’s become common for the “debate” on hydraulic fracturing to be described as two competing interests: critics allege it is unsafe, but the industry claims it is safe. As it turns out, when it comes to recognizing the inherent safety of “fracking,” that binary — environmental groups vs. the oil and gas industry — is not an accurate representation.

We know, for example, that anti-fracking groups are more than willing to deny science on issues like water contamination, air emissions, public health, and even failure rates for well casings. In their haste to malign the  industry, the facts were unfortunately left behind.

Don’t just take our word for it, either. Regulators and high-ranking officials throughout President Obama’s administration have consistently touted natural gas as “cleaner energy” and “safe.” The President himself has said we “need to encourage” more production of natural gas, an increasing share of which is being sourced from shale and other “tight” reservoirs.

As for hydraulic fracturing, the administration has also categorically rejected the claims of anti-fracking groups. For example, Food & Water Watch claims that hydraulic fracturing “is inherently unsafe and we cannot rely on regulation to protect communities’ water, air and public health.” The Sierra Club says “no state has adequate protections in place.” The recent efforts to enact local bans on hydraulic fracturing were not designed to improve regulations, but rather ban the process outright — all in the belief that hydraulic fracturing cannot safely occur.

But what does the Obama administration have to say? The exact opposite. For example:

  • Ernest Moniz, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy: “I think the issues in terms of the environmental footprint of hydraulic fracturing are manageable.”
  • Sally Jewell, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior: “Fracking has been done safely for many, many years.”
  • Gina McCarthy, Administrator of the U.S. EPA: “There’s nothing inherently dangerous in fracking that sound engineering practices can’t accomplish.”

Each of these officials’ predecessors made similar affirmations of safety.

These statements reflect a careful and sober review of the many studies and assessments of shale development, which looked at everything from air emissions to seismicity to water concerns.

These regulators and officials also have access to the same information that anti-fracking activists do. They’ve studied the same reports, and they read the same news. So it’s worth asking: Should we place more trust in groups who are ideologically opposed to oil and gas development, or federal regulators whose job is to keep the public safe?

CLICK HERE to see what top Obama administration officials say about the safety of hydraulic fracturing and the importance of U.S. natural gas development.

Comments

  1. Vicki Bauman says:

    While I support many of the President’s ideas, this is not one of them. I recently heard that President and Mrs. Obama will be relocating to Asheville when they leave office. If this is true, will the President be just as happy with his decision when he finds out that hydraulic fracturing has ruined the air and water quality of our beautiful state? People come here because the air is clean, the water is pure. Perhaps some people who have only lived in cities like Chicago their entire lives cannot even imagine what I am talking about. I live in a region where I drink the water that comes from my own well. There is no chlorine to kill germs and bacteria because the ones found here are beneficial and not polluted. I cannot stress enough that these legislators need to come visit my state. Come talk to the people who live here. Generations of people have grown up and lived here their entire lives. They don’t know what smog is. I do. I know what it’s like to live in a rat race. I came here very very sick. While I may not enjoy perfect health, I know it’s a darn sight better than where I came from. Please don’t let BIG BUSINESS, BIG OIL, BIG MONEY ruin our way of life. For some of us, it’s our last chance.

Trackbacks

  1. […] Even Obama administration officials have embraced responsible natural gas development, explaining the inherent safety of hydraulic fracturing as a key component. […]

  2. […] here is that Whitehouse thinks this is surprising news at all. A number ofObama administration officials, state regulators, and independent experts have consistently and explicitly debunked the urban […]

  3. […] involvement would reach far beyond Colorado, too.  Opposition to natural gas will pit him against President Obama and his administration, including EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, and Secretary of the […]

  4. […] Notice, too, how Fox cleverly skirts the issues, never denying methane migration is naturally occurring or can come from all sorts of activities. He also suggests “these things” are unhealthy or unsafe without ever saying exactly what he means by “these things” because, of course, he wants the reader to think it’s hydraulic fracturing or fracking when that process has absolutely nothing to do with methane migration. He continuously conflates drilling and fracking to make-believe they are the same but, of course, they’re not. He also pretends it is only the natural gas industry or Hill & Knowlton saying fracking is safe when, in fact, it’s also the last two EPA Administrators and a host of other Federal and state officials. […]

  5. […] under separate permitting structures than the UIC, so as long groundwater is protected. Given the safety record of hydraulic fracturing, it would be hard to argue against this – that is, if the real goal is […]

  6. […] top environmental regulator, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy said, “There’s nothing inherently dangerous in fracking that sound engineering practices […]

  7. […] Ernest Moniz, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy: “I think the issues in terms of the environmental footprint of hydraulic fracturing are manageable.” […]

Speak Your Mind

*